Replies: 7 comments
-
|
It's correct and GitHub has to fix it |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No need to worry about missing data, All actual commits and contribution data remain intact. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
yea |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No need ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you
…On Sun, Jan 4, 2026, 11:30 PM Jakarta1337 ***@***.***> wrote:
No need !
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#183463 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BO7YN6G7VDJNFNSSCMIALVD4FFWOLAVCNFSM6AAAAACQURTHNWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTKNBQHAYDOOI>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi There is no need to worry this is combined contribution chart mean it show all contribution. You can check it by switching years and adding their no of contribution. Your all contribution are safe. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Question
Body
At the beginning of 2026, the GitHub contributions graph appears to be incorrectly rendered.
The entire 2026 year is shown as fully populated, and some contribution squares appear in early 2025 dates where no commits were made.
This issue is reproducible across multiple accounts and profiles.
Switching between years (2025 ↔ 2026) temporarily fixes the display, suggesting a client-side rendering or caching issue rather than incorrect contribution data.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions