Possibility of restoring a repository after a serious policy violation (malware/security risk)?

[hillelkingqt]

Select Topic Area

Question

Body

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for some honest feedback regarding a repository of mine that was recently suspended.

To be completely transparent: when I started this project about six months ago, I made a very poor and immature decision to include malicious functionality (essentially a virus/stealer) within the releases. I was exploring things I shouldn't have, and I deeply regret the potential risk I caused to users.

A few months ago, I realized how wrong this was. I completely removed all the malicious code, deleted all previous releases, and tried to clean up the project to ensure it was safe and provided only the intended utility. Despite this, GitHub recently flagged the repo—likely due to the historical data or reports about those past versions.

I am a GitHub Pro user and I have submitted an appeal, explaining that the current codebase is clean and that I’ve learned a massive lesson about responsibility and ethics in software development.

My question is: Given the severity of the initial violation, does GitHub ever allow a 'second chance' if the user can prove the current project is safe and the harmful parts are gone? Or is a violation of this nature usually a permanent ban for the repository?

I appreciate any honest answers, even if they aren't what I hope to hear.

[Fizznap]

Based on GitHub’s enforcement history and Acceptable Use Policies, restoration is possible but not guaranteed, and for malware-related violations it is relatively uncommon.

GitHub treats repositories that intentionally distributed malicious code (stealers, backdoors, viruses, etc.) as severe violations, even if the malicious content was later removed. In most cases, deleting releases or cleaning the current codebase does not fully negate the original violation, because the risk to users already existed.

That said, GitHub does sometimes allow a second chance under very limited circumstances, usually when:

The user fully acknowledges responsibility (no denial or minimization),

The malicious content was removed completely (including history and releases),

The project has legitimate, non-harmful value on its own,

Trust & Safety determines the risk is fully neutralized.

Even in those situations, the more common outcome is that:

The original repository remains permanently disabled, but

The user account stays in good standing and the user is allowed to create a new, clean repository from scratch.

So realistically:

Permanent takedown of the repository is the default outcome for intentional malware distribution.

Restoration is rare, but not impossible.

Your transparency and acknowledgment will help your account standing, even if the repo itself is not reinstated.

At this point, the best approach is to wait for the Trust & Safety team’s decision and be prepared to rebuild the project in a new repository if needed.

[YussufEssam89]

Hi hillelkingqt,

Thanks for your transparency—it takes courage to own up to past mistakes. Here’s an honest overview of how GitHub typically handles situations like this:

---

1. Severity of the initial violation

GitHub treats malicious code in repositories very seriously, especially anything that could harm users’ systems (viruses, credential stealers, ransomware, etc.). Even if the malicious code is removed, GitHub keeps a record of violations.

---

2. Possibility of a “second chance”

• It is not impossible for a repository to be reinstated, but it is rare for severe violations.
• GitHub will usually consider:
  • The current state of the repository (clean code, no malicious binaries)
  • Evidence that the harmful functionality has been fully removed
  • The user’s account history and willingness to follow GitHub’s Terms of Service
• A well-documented appeal demonstrating responsibility, transparency, and corrective action can sometimes result in reinstatement, but there is no guarantee.

---

3. Likely outcomes

• If GitHub believes the repo now poses no risk, they may:
  • Reinstate the repository
  • Require additional conditions (e.g., monitoring or restricted access)
• If GitHub determines the violation was severe enough, the suspension may remain permanent.

---

4. Recommended steps

1. Continue your appeal with GitHub Support and provide:
   • Clear evidence that all malicious code and releases were removed
   • A summary of the changes made to ensure the repo is safe
   • Any tests or audits proving the repo is now secure
2. Document your lessons learned in a professional way; this shows responsibility and growth.
3. If the repository is not reinstated, you can start a new, fully clean project. Make sure it follows GitHub’s Community Guidelines and Terms of Service.

---

⚠️ Key takeaway

GitHub does occasionally allow “second chances,” but the more severe the original violation, the stricter the review. Your best path is full transparency, clear documentation, and proof of remediation.

---

Remember: your willingness to learn from the experience and maintain safe, ethical code is more important than any single repository. That mindset will serve you well in future projects.

[deycrypt]

Fact, that people trust and dowload your open source code and you in turn switch on webcam on underaged people goes to show you are just simply a disgusting person. I hope Github never re-instates your account. I am also looking at legal possibilities of your actions.
You have deleted your reddit account after several people complained their information was stolen and you have the audacity to ask this in Github community. Be aware that a legal issue is on its way.
https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleGeminiAI/comments/1mgfdqu/finally_a_real_gemini_desktop_app_for_windows/